A colorful source in a feature story is quoted extensively using incorrect grammar and poor word choices. What are the ethical dilemmas involved in editing this story?
When editing this story it is important not to change too much. You want to keep the story true. That being said I think that you can change some of the poor word choices and still get the point across. Just don’t over due it. I think that as an editor you are ethical responsibility not to change too much of the grammar used by the source. If you change too much you could be taking away from the story.
In a lengthy article on teen-aged drinking and drug use, several students refuse to talk to the student reporter on the record unless they can be promised anonymity. What are the ethical concerns here and what should the reporter and editor do?
As the reporter and editor of this story it would be completely unethical for them to name any of their sources if they said they would not use them. If you tell someone that you are going to do one thing and you do another. That is not ethical. On the other hand, if you have unnamed sources throwing other students under the bus would that be considered ethical? I feel that this could go either way.